Articles by Category
Articles by Issue
Current ContributorsWendy P. Heath, Ph.D.
Bruce D. Grannemann, M.A.
Sarah E. Malik
Jessica M. Salerno, PhD
Lynne Williams, Ph.D., J.D.
Mary E. Wood
Jacklyn E. Nagle, M.A.
Pamela Bucy Pierson, J.D.
Adam B. Shniderman, Ph.D.
Rita R. Handrich, Ph.D.
Ronald K. Bullis, Ph.D., J.D.
Barnes & Roberts
Keene Trial Consulting
- The Selective Allure of Neuroscience and Its Implications for The Courtroom on No Such Thing As A Sure Thing: Neuroscience, The Insanity Defense, and Sentencing Mitigation
- @TrueRedditLinks on Juror Questions: Why Attorneys Should Embrace Allowing Jurors To Ask Questions of Witnesses
- @Kireal on Talkin’ ‘bout our Generations: Are we who we wanted to be?
- Malak Habbak on Narrative Persuasion in Legal Settings: What’s the Story?
- @RickBriand on Police Deception during Interrogation and Its Surprising Influence on Jurors’ Perceptions of Confession Evidence
- @NewEyesOnIt on Predicting Jurors’ Verdict Preference from Behavioral Mimicry
- @civiljustice2 on Predicting Jurors’ Verdict Preference from Behavioral Mimicry
- @Tayllorred on Predicting Jurors’ Verdict Preference from Behavioral Mimicry
Patent Litigation Archive
by Ellen Brickman, Ph.D. and Julie Blackman, Ph.D.Posted on March 27, 2012 | 4 CommentsA look at ten ways mock jurors and focus group respondents view and process information in intellectual property cases.
by Julie Blackman, Ph.D. and Ellen Brickman, Ph.D. and Corinne BrennerPosted on March 1, 2010 | 1 CommentIn the past ten years, the Eastern District of Texas has become a wildly popular venue for plaintiffs in patent cases. This has been attributed to a number of factors including judicial expertise, plaintiff-friendly local rules, speedy dispositions and jurors who are predisposed to find for plaintiffs and award large […]
by Jason BarnesPosted on September 1, 2009 | 6 CommentsMake technology come alive for your audience by giving it a voice. Anthropomorphism connects our everyday experience with the world of bits and bytes.