Articles by Category
Articles by Issue
Current ContributorsDouglas L. Keene, Ph.D.
Rita R. Handrich, Ph.D.
Ivar Hannikainen, Ph.D.
Fiery Cushman, Ph.D.
Jillian M. Ware
Jessica L. Jones
N.J. Schweitzer, Ph.D.
Matthew Groebe, Ph.D.
Garold Stasser, Ph.D.
Kevin-Khristián Cosgriff-Hernandez, M.A.
Mykol C. Hamilton, Ph.D.
Emily Lindon, B.S.
Madeline Pitt, B.S.
Emily K. Robins, B.S.
Monica K. Miller, J.D., Ph.D.
David Caditz, Ph.D.
Barnes & Roberts
Keene Trial Consulting
- Wilhelmus Nicolaas De Rijk on “Only the Guilty Would Confess to Crimes” : Understanding the Mystery of False Confessions
- @MichelFloyd on On The Application of Game Theory in Jury Selection
- @123ddawn on Predicting Jurors’ Verdict Preference from Behavioral Mimicry
- @MStenDeut on Predicting Jurors’ Verdict Preference from Behavioral Mimicry
- Ken Broda-Bahm on The Ubiquitous Practice of “Prehabilitation” Leads Prospective Jurors to Conceal Their Biases
- @politiquestions on What We Do (and Don’t) Know about Race and Jurors
- @N7IRL on What We Do (and Don’t) Know about Race and Jurors
- @SofiaDistracted on What We Do (and Don’t) Know about Race and Jurors
Patent Litigation Archive
by Ellen Brickman, Ph.D. and Julie Blackman, Ph.D.Posted on March 27, 2012 | 4 CommentsA look at ten ways mock jurors and focus group respondents view and process information in intellectual property cases.
by Julie Blackman, Ph.D. and Ellen Brickman, Ph.D. and Corinne BrennerPosted on March 1, 2010 | 1 CommentIn the past ten years, the Eastern District of Texas has become a wildly popular venue for plaintiffs in patent cases. This has been attributed to a number of factors including judicial expertise, plaintiff-friendly local rules, speedy dispositions and jurors who are predisposed to find for plaintiffs and award large […]
by Jason BarnesPosted on September 1, 2009 | 6 CommentsMake technology come alive for your audience by giving it a voice. Anthropomorphism connects our everyday experience with the world of bits and bytes.