Articles by Category
Articles by Issue
Current ContributorsDouglas L. Keene, Ph.D.
Rita R. Handrich, Ph.D.
Ivar Hannikainen, Ph.D.
Fiery Cushman, Ph.D.
Jillian M. Ware
Jessica L. Jones
N.J. Schweitzer, Ph.D.
Matthew Groebe, Ph.D.
Garold Stasser, Ph.D.
Kevin-Khristián Cosgriff-Hernandez, M.A.
Mykol C. Hamilton, Ph.D.
Emily Lindon, B.S.
Madeline Pitt, B.S.
Emily K. Robbins, B.S.
Monica K. Miller, J.D., Ph.D.
David Caditz, Ph.D.
Barnes & Roberts
Keene Trial Consulting
- @Kireal on Talkin’ ‘bout our Generations: Are we who we wanted to be?
- Malak Habbak on Narrative Persuasion in Legal Settings: What’s the Story?
- @RickBriand on Police Deception during Interrogation and Its Surprising Influence on Jurors’ Perceptions of Confession Evidence
- @NewEyesOnIt on Predicting Jurors’ Verdict Preference from Behavioral Mimicry
- @civiljustice2 on Predicting Jurors’ Verdict Preference from Behavioral Mimicry
- @Tayllorred on Predicting Jurors’ Verdict Preference from Behavioral Mimicry
- @PrissyMcMiss on Predicting Jurors’ Verdict Preference from Behavioral Mimicry
- @JohnJoerg on Predicting Jurors’ Verdict Preference from Behavioral Mimicry
ExportSave as Clean XHTML
Voir Dire & Jury Selection Archive
by Douglas L. Keene, Ph.D. and Rita R. Handrich, Ph.D.Posted on August 20, 2014 | 8 CommentsAuthored by Doug Keene and Rita Handrich with a response from Paul Begala, this article takes a look at how the country has changed over the past 2 decades and our old definitions of Democrat or Republican and conservative or liberal are simply no longer useful. What does that mean for voir dire? What should it mean for voir dire? Two very good questions those.
by Mykol C. Hamilton, Ph.D. and Emily Lindon, B.S. and Madeline Pitt, B.S. and Emily K. Robbins, B.S.Posted on August 20, 2014 | 2 CommentsAuthored by Mykol C. Hamilton, Emily Lindon, Madeline Pitt, and Emily K. Robbins, with responses from Charli Morris and Diane Wiley, this article looks at how to not “prehabilitate” your jurors and offers ideas about alternate ways of asking the question rather than the tired, old “can you be fair and unbiased?”.
by David Caditz, Ph.D.Posted on August 20, 2014 | 2 CommentsAuthored by David M. Caditz with responses from Roy Futterman and Edward Schwartz. Suppose there was a more predictable, accurate and efficient way of exercising your peremptory strikes? Like using a computer model based on game theory? In this article, a physicist presents his thoughts on making those final decisions more logical and rational and based on the moves opposing counsel is likely to make.
by Gayle W. Herde, Ph.D.Posted on February 6, 2014 | 1 CommentWhat to listen for when you are wanting to know about religious faith in voir dire.
by Adam B. Shniderman, M.A.Posted on February 6, 2014 | 6 CommentsA very current update on neuroscience research and the neurologically impaired client.
by Alexis Forbes, PhDPosted on February 6, 2014 | 1 CommentWhat you need to know about LGBTQ culture and up-to-date language.
by Susan MacphersonPosted on February 6, 2014 | 15 CommentsStop asking jurors to do the impossible!
by Ken Broda-Bahm, Ph.D.Posted on November 5, 2013 | 2 CommentsHow can the Defense attorney strike back at the Reptile? Here's how.
by Adam B. Shniderman, M.A.Posted on November 5, 2013 | 7 CommentsNeutralizing negative pretrial publicity…before trial, in voir dire, and during trial.
by Michael J. Bernstein, PhD and Ethan Zell, PhDPosted on November 5, 2013 | No CommentsIs it possible we really do not know our own political leanings?