Articles by Category
Articles by Issue
Current ContributorsWendy P. Heath, Ph.D.
Bruce D. Grannemann, M.A.
Sarah E. Malik
Jessica M. Salerno, PhD
Lynne Williams, Ph.D., J.D.
Mary E. Wood
Jacklyn E. Nagle, M.A.
Pamela Bucy Pierson, J.D.
Adam B. Shniderman, Ph.D.
Rita R. Handrich, Ph.D.
Ronald K. Bullis, Ph.D., J.D.
Barnes & Roberts
Keene Trial Consulting
- @ScattergoodFdn on A Qualitative Examination of Self-Care in Lawyers
- Katherine Bender on A Qualitative Examination of Self-Care in Lawyers
- Scripturient on Panic Over the Unknown: America Hates Atheists
- Rita Handrich @ The Jury Room on Book Review: Law and Neuroscience
- @LitigationBids on Ten Dynamite Tips to Improve Your Results From Group Voir Dire
- @NeuroscienceLaw on The Selective Allure of Neuroscience and Its Implications for The Courtroom
- @mghclbb on The Selective Allure of Neuroscience and Its Implications for The Courtroom
- @Diana1336 on Juror Stress: The Hidden Influence of the Jury Experience
Voir Dire & Jury Selection Archive
by Lynne Williams, Ph.D., J.D.Posted on November 26, 2014 | 1 CommentHow do you choose a jury for a antiwar protestor trial versus a jury for a civil disobedience trial? An experienced trial consultant offers a peek into her brain as she chooses two very different juries.
by Douglas L. Keene, Ph.D. and Rita R. Handrich, Ph.D.Posted on August 20, 2014 | 8 CommentsAuthored by Doug Keene and Rita Handrich with a response from Paul Begala, this article takes a look at how the country has changed over the past 2 decades and our old definitions of Democrat or Republican and conservative or liberal are simply no longer useful. What does that mean for voir dire? What should it mean for voir dire? Two very good questions those.
by Mykol C. Hamilton, Ph.D. and Emily Lindon, B.S. and Madeline Pitt, B.S. and Emily K. Robbins, B.S.Posted on August 20, 2014 | 2 CommentsAuthored by Mykol C. Hamilton, Emily Lindon, Madeline Pitt, and Emily K. Robbins, with responses from Charli Morris and Diane Wiley, this article looks at how to not “prehabilitate” your jurors and offers ideas about alternate ways of asking the question rather than the tired, old “can you be fair and unbiased?”.
by David Caditz, Ph.D.Posted on August 20, 2014 | 2 CommentsAuthored by David M. Caditz with responses from Roy Futterman and Edward Schwartz. Suppose there was a more predictable, accurate and efficient way of exercising your peremptory strikes? Like using a computer model based on game theory? In this article, a physicist presents his thoughts on making those final decisions more logical and rational and based on the moves opposing counsel is likely to make.
by Gayle W. Herde, Ph.D.Posted on February 6, 2014 | 1 CommentWhat to listen for when you are wanting to know about religious faith in voir dire.
by Adam B. Shniderman, M.A.Posted on February 6, 2014 | 7 CommentsA very current update on neuroscience research and the neurologically impaired client.
by Alexis Forbes, PhDPosted on February 6, 2014 | 1 CommentWhat you need to know about LGBTQ culture and up-to-date language.
by Susan MacphersonPosted on February 6, 2014 | 15 CommentsStop asking jurors to do the impossible!
by Ken Broda-Bahm, Ph.D.Posted on November 5, 2013 | 2 CommentsHow can the Defense attorney strike back at the Reptile? Here's how.
by Adam B. Shniderman, M.A.Posted on November 5, 2013 | 7 CommentsNeutralizing negative pretrial publicity…before trial, in voir dire, and during trial.