Articles by Category
Articles by Issue
Current ContributorsDouglas L. Keene, Ph.D.
Rita R. Handrich, Ph.D.
Ivar Hannikainen, Ph.D.
Fiery Cushman, Ph.D.
Jillian M. Ware
Jessica L. Jones
N.J. Schweitzer, Ph.D.
Matthew Groebe, Ph.D.
Garold Stasser, Ph.D.
Kevin-Khristián Cosgriff-Hernandez, M.A.
Mykol C. Hamilton, Ph.D.
Emily Lindon, B.S.
Madeline Pitt, B.S.
Emily K. Robbins, B.S.
Monica K. Miller, J.D., Ph.D.
David Caditz, Ph.D.
Barnes & Roberts
Keene Trial Consulting
- Rita Handrich @ The Jury Room on Online and Wired for Justice: Why Jurors Turn to the Internet (the “Google mistrial”)
- @RealmQuests on A Necessary Evil: Edward Tufte and Making the Best of PowerPoint
- Offices @1100 Peachtree on Leveraging Social Media for Litigation
- Doug Keene @ The Jury Room on Demographic Roulette: What Was Once a Bad Idea Has Gotten Worse
- Karen’s Shot of Energy on Generation X members are “active, balanced and happy”. Seriously?
- Rich Matthews @ Juryology: Art & Science of Jury Persuasion on Expert Witness Preparation: What Does the Literature Tell Us?
- @CentreC on The Ubiquitous Practice of “Prehabilitation” Leads Prospective Jurors to Conceal Their Biases
- @RoyFutterman on On The Application of Game Theory in Jury Selection
Vol. 24/No. 3 May 2012 Archive
by Karenna F. Malavanti and Megan K. Johnson and Wade C. Rowatt and Charles A. Weaver, III.Posted on May 29, 2012 | 13 CommentsAre we doing enough to address bias in the courtroom? This research would say we are probably not--as it examines the impact of religious cues on racism in the courtroom.
by Douglas L. Keene, Ph.D. and Rita R. Handrich, Ph.D.Posted on May 29, 2012 | 11 CommentsTwo trial consultants apply social science research findings to the crafting of prosecution and defense trial narratives. How can the George Zimmerman/Trayvon Martin case be explained to jurors?
by Katherine James, MFAPosted on May 29, 2012 | 3 CommentsPractical and plain language advice on how to manage "crazy" witnesses in highly publicized trials.
by Doug Carner, CPP/CHS-IIIPosted on May 29, 2012 | 12 CommentsTop tips for refining expert witness testimony.
“A Parade of Horribles”—Broccoli, Burial Markets, and Justice Scalia’s Wife: The Role of Analogies in Human Decision-Making from Justices to Jurorsby Ryan A. Malphurs, Ph.D. and L. Hailey DrescherPosted on May 29, 2012 | 7 CommentsAdopting lessons learned at the Supreme Court in using analogies to assist in telling your story at trial.
by Rita R. Handrich, Ph.D.Posted on May 29, 2012 | 1 CommentA review of the new encyclopedia of the intersection of the law and mind sciences: Ideology, Psychology, and the Law (2012).
by Andrea Krebel, Ph.D.Posted on May 29, 2012 | 14 CommentsHere's a look at the reasons why attorneys would do well to embrace rather than resist the submission of juror questions for witnesses.
by Rita R. Handrich, Ph.D.Posted on May 29, 2012 | No CommentsMuch has happened since we last published and we have attempted to keep up with it by bringing you multiple articles on current topics. Racism and bias are our wheelhouse in the world of trial consulting and so we have two articles for you on that arena. First, a research […]