Articles by Category
Articles by Issue
Current ContributorsDouglas L. Keene, Ph.D.
Rita R. Handrich, Ph.D.
Ivar Hannikainen, Ph.D.
Fiery Cushman, Ph.D.
Jillian M. Ware
Jessica L. Jones
N.J. Schweitzer, Ph.D.
Matthew Groebe, Ph.D.
Garold Stasser, Ph.D.
Kevin-Khristián Cosgriff-Hernandez, M.A.
Mykol C. Hamilton, Ph.D.
Emily Lindon, B.S.
Madeline Pitt, B.S.
Emily K. Robbins, B.S.
Monica K. Miller, J.D., Ph.D.
David Caditz, Ph.D.
Barnes & Roberts
Keene Trial Consulting
- @TrueRedditLinks on Juror Questions: Why Attorneys Should Embrace Allowing Jurors To Ask Questions of Witnesses
- @Kireal on Talkin’ ‘bout our Generations: Are we who we wanted to be?
- Malak Habbak on Narrative Persuasion in Legal Settings: What’s the Story?
- @RickBriand on Police Deception during Interrogation and Its Surprising Influence on Jurors’ Perceptions of Confession Evidence
- @NewEyesOnIt on Predicting Jurors’ Verdict Preference from Behavioral Mimicry
- @civiljustice2 on Predicting Jurors’ Verdict Preference from Behavioral Mimicry
- @Tayllorred on Predicting Jurors’ Verdict Preference from Behavioral Mimicry
- @PrissyMcMiss on Predicting Jurors’ Verdict Preference from Behavioral Mimicry
ExportSave as Clean XHTML
Vol. 24/No. 3 May 2012 Archive
by Karenna F. Malavanti and Megan K. Johnson and Wade C. Rowatt and Charles A. Weaver, III.Posted on May 29, 2012 | 13 CommentsAre we doing enough to address bias in the courtroom? This research would say we are probably not--as it examines the impact of religious cues on racism in the courtroom.
by Douglas L. Keene, Ph.D. and Rita R. Handrich, Ph.D.Posted on May 29, 2012 | 12 CommentsTwo trial consultants apply social science research findings to the crafting of prosecution and defense trial narratives. How can the George Zimmerman/Trayvon Martin case be explained to jurors?
by Katherine James, MFAPosted on May 29, 2012 | 3 CommentsPractical and plain language advice on how to manage "crazy" witnesses in highly publicized trials.
by Doug Carner, CPP/CHS-IIIPosted on May 29, 2012 | 12 CommentsTop tips for refining expert witness testimony.
“A Parade of Horribles”—Broccoli, Burial Markets, and Justice Scalia’s Wife: The Role of Analogies in Human Decision-Making from Justices to Jurorsby Ryan A. Malphurs, Ph.D. and L. Hailey DrescherPosted on May 29, 2012 | 7 CommentsAdopting lessons learned at the Supreme Court in using analogies to assist in telling your story at trial.
by Rita R. Handrich, Ph.D.Posted on May 29, 2012 | 1 CommentA review of the new encyclopedia of the intersection of the law and mind sciences: Ideology, Psychology, and the Law (2012).
by Andrea Krebel, Ph.D.Posted on May 29, 2012 | 15 CommentsHere's a look at the reasons why attorneys would do well to embrace rather than resist the submission of juror questions for witnesses.
by Rita R. Handrich, Ph.D.Posted on May 29, 2012 | No CommentsMuch has happened since we last published and we have attempted to keep up with it by bringing you multiple articles on current topics. Racism and bias are our wheelhouse in the world of trial consulting and so we have two articles for you on that arena. First, a research […]